Triangulated Categories Part II
نویسنده
چکیده
The results in this note are all from [Nee01] or [BN93]. For necessary background on cardinals (particularly regular and singular cardinals) see our notes on Basic Set Theory (BST). In our BST notes there is no mention of grothendieck universes, whereas all our notes on category theory (including this one) are implicitly working inside a fixed grothendieck universe U using the conglomerate convention for U (FCT,Definition 5). So some explanation of how these two situations interact is in order. Definition 1. The expression ordinal has the meaning given in (BST,Definition 2), and a cardinal is a special type of ordinal (BST,Definition 7). Under the conglomerate convention, ordinals and cardinals are a priori conglomerates, not necessarily sets. We say an ordinal α is small if it is a small conglomerate. We make the following observations • If α ≺ β are ordinals with β small, then α is also small. • If an ordinal α is small, so is α = α ∪ {α}. • The first infinite cardinal ω = א0 is always small, by our convention that grothendieck universes are always infinite (FCT,Definition 4). Therefore every finite cardinal is small. Remark 1. Although in our BST notes we consider the finite cardinals 0, 1 to be regular, it is our convention throughout this note that all regular cardinals are infinite. This just saves us from writing expressions like “small infinite regular cardinal” repeatedly. Remark 2. Recall that when we say a category C is complete, or even just has coproducts, we mean that all set-indexed colimits (resp. coproducts) exist in C (we are working under the conglomerate convention, so a set is an element of our universe U). If β is a small cardinal, we say that C has β-coproducts if any family of objects {Xi}i∈I in C indexed by a set I of cardinality < β has a coproduct. For example, C has finite coproducts iff. it has א0-coproducts and has countable coproducts iff. it has א1-coproducts.
منابع مشابه
K–theory for Triangulated Categories Iii(a): the Theorem of the Heart
T are henceforth to be viewed as identical. The reason for this is that, after Section II.2, we have nothing more to say about the construction without differentials. In Section II.2, we proved some significant facts about the simplicial set without the differentials. The reader is referred to the introduction of K–theory for triangulated categories II for more detail. Anyway, from Section II.3...
متن کاملHomological Algebra in Bivariant K-theory and Other Triangulated Categories. Ii
We use homological ideals in triangulated categories to get a sufficient criterion for a pair of subcategories in a triangulated category to be complementary. We apply this criterion to construct the Baum–Connes assembly map for locally compact groups and torsion-free discrete quantum groups. Our methods are related to the abstract version of the Adams spectral sequence by Brinkmann and Christe...
متن کاملTriangulated Categories Part I
Triangulated categories are important structures lying at the confluence of several exciting areas of mathematics (and even physics). Our notes on the subject are divided into three parts which, if named by the major construction occurring within them, would be titled “Verdier quotients”, “Thomason localisaton” and “Brown representability”. There are many places to learn about triangulated cate...
متن کاملThe axioms for n-angulated categories
Triangulated categories were introduced independently in algebraic geometry by Verdier [7, 8], based on ideas of Grothendieck, and in algebraic topology by Puppe [6]. These constructions have since played a crucial role in representation theory, algebraic geometry, commutative algebra, algebraic topology and other areas of mathematics (and even theoretical physics). Recently, Geiss, Keller and ...
متن کاملTriangulated categories without models
We exhibit examples of triangulated categories which are neither the stable category of a Frobenius category nor a full triangulated subcategory of the homotopy category of a stable model category. Even more drastically, our examples do not admit any non-trivial exact functors to or from these algebraic respectively topological triangulated categories. Introduction. Triangulated categories are ...
متن کاملTriangulated Categories: Definitions, Properties and Examples
Triangulated categories were introduced in the mid 1960’s by J.L. Verdier in his thesis, reprinted in [15]. Axioms similar to Verdier’s were independently also suggested in [2]. Having their origins in algebraic geometry and algebraic topology, triangulated categories have by now become indispensable in many different areas of mathematics. Although the axioms might seem a bit opaque at first si...
متن کامل